ORACLE CORP. (ORCL)
Analyst Opinion: NEUTRAL
|
(in $ millions, except per share data)
Year Ended May 31
|
Q1 FY07
|
Q2 FY07
|
Q3 FY07E
|
Q4 FY07E
|
FY06
|
FY07E
|
FY08E
|
|
Total revenues
|
3,591
|
4,163
|
4,347
|
5,947
|
14,380
|
17,858
|
20,942
|
|
Operating income
|
936
|
1,357
|
1,228
|
2,199
|
4,736
|
5,714
|
6,568
|
|
Net income
|
663
|
967
|
831
|
1,508
|
3,381
|
4,024
|
4,560
|
|
Diluted Earnings per share (US GAAP):
|
$0.13
|
$0.18
|
$0.16
|
$0.28
|
$0.64
|
$0.76
|
$0.86
|
Summary
We believe Oracle is fairly valued. Oracle is a successful
software and IT services company, which has exhibited strong growth, fuelled by
an aggressive acquisition-driven strategy. It is a multibillion company with a
strong brand name and large customer base. However, the company has been
relying on acquisitions for its growth and faces very strong competition,
represented by such industry giants as Microsoft, IBM and SAP. The latter is a
leader in many business software segments and is developing its own set of SOA
tools, an area heavily targeted by Oracle. However, unlike Oracle, SAP has
reported strong organic growth and is in no position to give up its market share.
Currently, Oracle has built a strong portfolio of companies, but it will need
to consolidate them efficiently, recovering the margins that suffered in the
past two years. It will also have to make an effort at pushing organic growth
to rates comparable with SAP's to keep and gain market share.
Highlights:
Company size
Large size provides numerous benefits: credibility, rich
resource base (including human capital, research facilities, intellectual
property), cross-subsidization possibilities, relative ease of entry into new
industries/segments, possibility to work with large customers (governments,
multinationals etc), economies of scale, bargaining power and lobbying,
purchasing power for acquisitions.
Wide range of products
Oracle targets the corporate segment of the software
consumer market and offers a wide range of business software, developed both
internally and acquired through purchase of subsidiaries. The products include:
Technology Products: Database and Grids, Middleware, Data
Hubs, Developer Tools, Security, Search, Enterprise Management, Business
Intelligence, Collaboration, Content, Data Warehousing, Linux;
Application Products: Customer Relationship Management,
Financial Accounting, Human Resources, Supply Chain, Public Sector
Applications, Banking Applications, Retail Applications, Telecom Applications,
Higher Education Applications and other;
Services: Support, Education, On Demand, Financing, INSIGHT,
Consulting.
The company is also developing a new integrated product
suite planned for initial release in 2008 - the Fusion Project (discussed
below). With such an extensive portfolio and significant expertise, Oracle is a
world-class leader and a standard-setting player in its domain.
Expansion into industry subsectors through acquisitions
Oracle has been acquiring subsidiaries in other market
segments, benefiting from existing customer bases, technology and trust already
gained by the target companies. Oracle's size and customer base both allow and
require the company to keep looking for new directions to expand to. In the
past several years, Oracle has been very active in terms of acquisitions,
buying both small and big IT companies.
|
Company
|
Month/Year
|
Industry
|
Valuation
|
|
Collaxa
|
June 2004
|
Business Process Management
|
n/a
|
|
PeopleSoft
|
January 2005
|
Enterprise Software
|
$11.1 billion
|
|
Oblix
|
March 2005
|
Identity Management Solutions
|
n/a
|
|
Retek
|
April 2005
|
Retail Industry Solutions
|
$701 million
|
|
TripleHop
|
June 2005
|
Context-sensitive Enterprise Search
|
n/a
|
|
TimesTen
|
June 2005
|
Real-time Enterprise Solutions
|
n/a
|
|
ProfitLogic
|
July 2005
|
Retail Industry Solutions
|
n/a
|
|
Context Media
|
July 2005
|
Enterprise Content Integration
|
n/a
|
|
i-flex
|
August 2005
|
Banking Industry Solutions
|
$847 million*
|
|
G-Log
|
September 2005
|
Logistics Hib Solutions
|
n/a
|
|
Innobase
|
October 2005
|
Discrete TransactionalSource Database Technology
|
n/a
|
|
Thor Technologies
|
November 2005
|
Enterprise-wide User Provisioning Solutions.
|
n/a
|
|
OctetString
|
November 2005
|
Virtual Directory Solutions
|
n/a
|
|
Temposoft
|
December 2005
|
Workforce Management Applications
|
n/a
|
|
360Commerce
|
January 2006
|
Retail Industry Solutions
|
n/a
|
|
Siebel Systems
|
January 2006
|
Customer Relationship Management Solutions
|
$6.1 billion
|
|
Sleepycat
|
February 2006
|
Source Database Software for Embedded Applications
|
n/a
|
|
HotSip
|
February 2006
|
Communications Infrastructure Solutions
|
n/a
|
|
Portal Software
|
April 2006
|
Software Suite for Communications Industry
|
n/a
|
|
Net4Call
|
April 2006
|
Service Delivery Platform for Communications Industry
|
n/a
|
|
Demantra
|
June 2006
|
Demand-driven Planning Solutions
|
n/a
|
|
Telephony@Work
|
June 2006
|
IP-based Contact Center Technology
|
n/a
|
|
Sigma Dynamics
|
August 2006
|
Real-time Predictive Analytics Software
|
n/a
|
|
Sunopsis
|
October 2006
|
Enterprise Integration Software
|
n/a
|
|
MetaSolv Software
|
October 2006
|
Solutions for Communications Service Providers
|
$219 million
|
|
SPL WorldGroup
|
November 2006
|
Revenue and Operations Management Software
|
n/a
|
|
Stellent
|
December 2006
|
Content Management Solutions
|
$440 million
|
* As of August 31, 2006.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Corporation, SEC
filings.
Oracle leads in many market segments
Oracle is an experienced multibillion company, present in
several key software markets. The company is a leader in many of the market
segments it is present in, This leadership is the result of both internal
developments (such as its database business) and acquisitions (such as the
acquisition of Siebel, which allowed Oracle to narrow the gap between itself
and SAP in the CRM market from 20 to just 3 percentage points[1]).
Fusion Applications scheduled for release in 2008
Oracle plans to launch a new business software suite that
will combine the functionality of its currently separate software packages,
offering greater data management capabilities to businesses than standalone
applications. An analyst notes that "if Fusion works as advertised, Oracle
could wind up dominating the software world this decade much as Microsoft
dominated the last one."[2] Fusion Middleware
already has 30,000 users[3] allowing customers
to use software from different vendors. However, SAP is planning to launch its
own SOA-based suite in 2007, with its NetWeaver SOA platform launched in 2004.
Aggressive business strategy
As illustrated by Oracle's move to provide low cost support
to Red Hat Enterprise Linux users and by the announcement to create and offer its
own version of Linux operating system, Oracle uses a very aggressive business
strategy, trying to 'steal' customers from competitors or at least to make
competitors' lives harder. This strategy is also exemplified by the acquisition
activity discussed above and by numerous partnerships that Oracle keeps
establishing with various industry players.
Partnerships with industry leaders
Oracle has partnered with a number of leading companies in
the IT industry, among which are Dell, HP, Intel and others. Through such
partnerships, Oracle benefits from greater exposure to potential customers,
from increased trust inferred from the expertise of its partners and from
cross-marketing opportunities. Of course, competitors also rely on partnerships
and Oracle partnering with other companies mostly offsets similar relationships
between competitors.
Sound financials with healthy balance sheet
Oracle has exhibited accelerating revenue growth rates in
the past several years following revenue stagnation in 2003, resulting from its
aggressive business strategy and partly fueled by acquisitions. Such high
growth rates are not typical for multi-billion companies and represent a
strength on their own. However, much of the revenue growth came from
acquisitions:

Fiscal year ends May 31. Pro forma data includes only Siebel and PeopleSoft
acquisitions. Source: SEC filings, our calculations
Nonetheless, in H1FY07, organic revenue year-over-year
growth was 17% with 28% total revenue year-over-year growth. In the Q1FY07
Earnings Call[4], the company's CFO noted that in
Q1FY07 Oracle had its strongest Q1 licensed growth in more than five years and
that the company was gaining share across all product lines. This was also the
third consecutive quarter in which Oracle had applications license growth
greater than 75%[5].
The company's EPS has also been growing steadily as a result
of both revenue increase and share buybacks. The company plans to buy back $1
billion worth of shares every quarter until the end of the fiscal year. Since
the inception of Oracle's share repurchase program in 1992 through FY06, the
company repurchased 1.8 billion of its shares for a total of $20.7 billion, and
in July 2006 the company's Board extended the repurchase program so that
another $4 billion worth of shares could be repurchased. During the six months
ended November 30, 2006, ORCL repurchased 121.3 million shares for $2.0
billion.
The Q2FY07 balance sheet exhibited decent liquidity, with the
current ratio at 1.75, cash & equivalents and marketable securities
together accounting for 27% of all assets, and net working capital standing at
$5.6 billion. At the same time, financial debt stood at $5.9 billion, or 20.4%
of total assets.
Positive guidance provided by management for Q3FY07[6]:
- New software license revenues are expected to be up 16% to 22%
year-over-year;
- Total revenue is expected to be up 23% to 25% on a GAAP
basis;
- Net income is expected to growth 24% to 29% on a GAAP basis;
- GAAP EPS is expected to be $0.18-0.19, up from $0.14 last
year.
Risks:
Company size
Large size also brings some disadvantages: multiple levels
of management increase bureaucracy, small but highly lucrative niches may
remain unnoticed/unattended and left to smaller players to fill in,
difficulties to implement corporation-wide changes, antitrust attention from governments,
any errors/malfunctions in products immediately create bad publicity.
Strong competition
Oracle faces competition from Microsoft, SAP, IBM etc. - some
of the biggest corporations in the world. Other competitors are also well
established big companies with large resource and customer bases. Thus
competing with all of them efficiently requires a lot of financial and
marketing resources, as well as management attention. Some moves by the company
to fend off competition may prove to be ineffective and considered too costly
by shareholders and the professional public. For example, the move to compete
with Red Hat in the corporate Linux space has been received by the industry
with mixed feelings. On one hand, Red Hat is forced to cut down pricing and faces
a threat of customer outflow. On the other hand, analysts observe that customer
loyalty and Red Hat's software certification program are very hard to beat. Besides,
the revenues that Oracle might take away from Red Hat would not make much of a
difference at the bottom line for Oracle[7]. Moreover,
a RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady considers that "in the short term, this will
be a problem in terms of perception and customer apprehension. In the longer
term, this could actually reinforce Red Hat's preeminence."
SAP is one of Oracle's main competitors. SAP is the market
share leader in the CRM, ERP, and SCM spaces, according to Gartner Dataquest[8], and has partnered with Microsoft to make
its applications integrate easily with MS Office applications. SAP is also
developing a Services Oriented Architecture suite which may be launched as soon
as in 2007, one year before Oracle's Fusion application suite. It's SOA
platform - NetWeaver - was launched in 2004. At its recent European TechEd
conference in Amsterdam, SAPd the NetWeaver platform to a broader
development community[9]. Via the online SAP
Developers Network, developers will be able to purchase individual
subscriptions to SAP software, allowing them to test, evaluate and develop
tools in NetWeaver. Previously, access to development tools was available only
for companies that had purchased SAP software. The subscription program will
include access to technical support, premium content and online access for
testing enterprise services. The program is scheduled to begin in 2007.
SAP also has a large customer base and a strong brand name. Just
like Oracle attacked Red Hat, SAP attacked Oracle earlier this year, offering
support to Siebel customers at lower rates[10]
than Oracle's. SAP also boasts growing revenues, including in Oracle's home
market - the US, where it had 15% growth of Software revenues in Q3FY06, and
has issued a positive outlook for the year in October, while stating that SAP
was gaining market share and growing mainly organically, as opposed to Oracle's
acquisition-driven growth[11]. SAP expects
full-year 2006 product revenues to increase by 13-15% year-over-year, based on
the expectation for full-year 2006 software revenue growth in the range of 15%
to 17%, compared to 2005.
Relative security weakness of Oracle databases
The company's key product suffers from weak security
compared to competitors. Recently, a security researcher from NGS Software
published a white paper comparing security robustness of database software from
several producers[12]. Oracle's products
were recognized to contain more security bugs than Microsoft's SQL Server
products.
The number of security flaws in the Oracle and Microsoft
database servers that have been discovered and fixed since December 2000 until
November 2006:

Source: http://www.databasesecurity.com/dbsec/comparison.pdf
Another report by the Enterprise Management Group[13], also notes Oracle's relatively poor
security record. In fact, security vendor Argeniss has announced that it will
have a "week of Oracle Database bugs" in December focusing on Oracle's poor
security record.
Such poor security record can cast a shadow of doubt on
Oracle's other products and reduce customer trust, especially when data
security is being addressed on national level in many countries.
Fast expansion and tight competition have eroded Oracle's
profit margins
Rapid expansion came at the price of margins, with both
operating and net margins experiencing a decline during 2005-2006.

Fiscal year ends May 31. Source: SEC filings, our calculations.
SWOT Analysis
|
Strengths
- Big size: large resource base;
- Leadership in many market segments;
- Strong brand name and reputation;
- Partnerships with industry leaders;
- Diversified product portfolio;
- Strong revenue growth;
- Sound financial situation;
- Fusion suite to be launched in 2008;
- Aggressive business strategy;
- Positive guidance.
|
Weaknesses
- Relatively poor safety record;
- Acquisitions have been the main source of revenue
growth, while organic growth slowed down in FY06.
- Mr. Ellison likes to make unsubstantiated statements
which eventually may lead to trouble.
|
|
Opportunities
- Continuous adoption of BPO and related software;
- Increasing adoption of software-as-a-service concept;
- Globalization driving multinational companies to implement
software that reduces costs and increases efficiency, to remain competitive.
|
Threats
- Tough competition against very large players;
- SAP is developing a competing SOA suite;
- Fast expansion erodes margins;
- Increasing size of corporation may deteriorate management
focus.
|
Industry
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) applications market:
Oracle is the fastest market share gainer
The ERP applications market is expected to reach $29 billion
in 2006[14] or 14.2% higher than in 2005. Also, for
the next five years the market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 10%.
While Oracle is expected to maintain its second position in
terms of market share, it is likely to enjoy the largest growth in the ERP
application segment compared to other Top 5 ERP vendors and at 2x the overall market
growth rate.
|
Top 5 ERP Vendors
|
2004 Revenue Share
|
2005 Revenue Share
|
2006 Revenue Share
|
Revenue Growth Rate 2005-06
|
|
SAP
|
40%
|
42%
|
43%
|
17%
|
|
Oracle
|
10%
|
20%
|
23%
|
29%
|
|
Sage Group
|
5%
|
6%
|
6%
|
10%
|
|
Microsoft
|
3%
|
4%
|
4%
|
18%
|
|
SSA Global
|
3%
|
3%
|
3%
|
3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL MARKET
|
|
100% = $25.4 billion
|
100% = $29 billion
|
14%
|
Source: AMR Research (2006)
Business analytics software and data warehousing tools
market: Oracle is the market leader
Oracle was recognized as the leading business analytics
software and data warehousing tools vendor for 2005, retaining a market share
of 13.1% or $2.2 billion of the $16.6 billion total market[15].
This market grew by 11% in 2005.
Oracle is the world leader in the data warehousing tools
market with a 19.3% market share and $1.9 billion[16]
in 2005 software revenues. Oracle is also the leading vendor in the data
warehouse management category with a 39.8% market share and $1.6 billion in
revenues for 2005. Oracle's closest competitor in the category had a 22.7%
market share.
Worldwide relational database market (RDBMS): Oracle is the
market leader
Worldwide relational database management systems (RDBMS)
total software revenue increased by 8.3% in 2005 reaching $13.8 billion[17]. Of the top 5 vendors, just Microsoft
experienced a growth rate above the industry average, primarily due to pent-up
demand for SQL Server 2005.
|
RDBMS, top vendors
|
2005 Market Share
|
|
Oracle
|
48.6%
|
|
IBM
|
22.0%
|
|
Microsoft
|
15.0%
|
|
Teradata
|
3.2%
|
|
Sybase
|
2.9%
|
|
Other
|
8.2%
|
|
TOTAL
|
100% = $13.8 billion, 8.3% yoy growth
|
Source: Gartner.
Customer relationship management (CRM) software market:
Oracle is much closer to the leading position after the acquisition of Siebel
Worldwide CRM software market reached $5.7 billion,
experiencing 14%[18] growth in 2005
over 2004, driven by companies looking for more opportunities to drive revenue
and expand business lines.
In 2005, SAP was the top CRM vendor in terms of revenue (26%
market share), followed by Siebel (17%), Oracle (6%), Salesforce.com (5%) and
Amdocs (5%). However after the acquisition of Siebel Systems in January 2006,
Oracle attained a 23% market share.
Application integration and middleware (AIM) market: Oracle has
the strongest momentum in the segment
The application integration market reached $8.5 billion in
2005, a 7.1% increase over 2004. The main players were: IBM (a clear leader
with market share of 37%), BEA Systems (14.5%), Oracle (8.7%), Microsoft (4.7%)
and Tibco (3.7%).
Oracle - with the highest momentum in the segment -
witnessed revenue growth of 40% in 2005.
2005 Worldwide Vendor Revenue Estimates for AIM Software
(Millions of Dollars)[19]
|
Company
|
2004
|
2005
|
|
2004-2005 Growth (%)
|
|
2004 Market Share (%)
|
2005 Market Share (%)
|
|
IBM
|
2,959.8
|
3,159.4
|
|
6.7
|
|
37.3
|
37.2
|
|
BEA Systems
|
1,163.3
|
1,232.5
|
|
6
|
|
14.7
|
14.5
|
|
Oracle
|
529.8
|
739.4
|
|
39.6
|
|
6.7
|
8.7
|
|
Microsoft
|
350.3
|
397.1
|
|
13.4
|
|
4.4
|
4.7
|
|
Tibco
|
289.9
|
314.4
|
|
8.5
|
|
3.7
|
3.7
|
|
Other Vendors
|
2,643.0
|
2,657.3
|
|
0.5
|
|
33.3
|
31.3
|
|
TOTAL
|
7,936.1
|
8,500.2
|
|
7.1
|
|
100
|
100
|
Source: Gartner Dataquest (May 2006)
Oracle versus Peers
Despite its aggressive acquisition strategy, ORCL maintains
superior profitability level compared to other giants from the IT space; in
terms of operating and net margin being exceeded just by Microsoft.
|
|
ORCL
|
SAP
|
MSFT
|
IBM[20]
|
|
Market Cap, $Bn:
|
101.8
|
258.1
|
295.1
|
NA
|
|
Revenue, $Bn (ttm):
|
15.2
|
12.1
|
45.4
|
15.8
|
|
Latest Quarter Rev. Growth (yoy):
|
29.7%
|
11.5%
|
11.0%
|
5.5%
|
|
Revenue per employee, Mn
|
0.27
|
0.34
|
0.64
|
NA
|
|
Gross Margin (ttm):
|
77.1%
|
65.9%
|
82.2%
|
87.5%
|
|
EBITDA Margin (ttm):
|
40.5%
|
30.1%
|
41.9%
|
NA
|
|
Operating Margin (ttm):
|
34.1%
|
27.5%
|
39.4%
|
31.0%
|
|
Net Margin (ttm):
|
23.2%
|
18.5%
|
28.5%
|
18.0%
|
Source: Yahoo! Finance, SEC filings.
Valuation
- We expect ORCL to report:
- $18 billion in sales for FY07 and $21 billion in FY08;
- GAAP diluted EPS of $0.76 (FY07) and $0.86 (FY08).
While estimated P/S ratio unveils a premium of ORCL over
peers multiple, we believe it is warranted by superior profitability. According
to peers' median P/E multiple, ORCL seems fairly valued.
Overall, we are quite optimistic about ORCL and consider it
may show further positive developments. But we consider that at current stock
price, the investment gain is limited.
|
12/28/06
|
TICKER
|
MRKT CAP
|
PRICE
|
PE
|
PE
|
P/S
|
P/S
|
|
COMPANY NAME
|
SYMBOL
|
(MILS)
|
PER SHR
|
CAL 2006
|
CAL 2007
|
CAL 2006
|
CAL 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMDOCS
|
DOX
|
7,758
|
38.00
|
19.69
|
17.12
|
2.98
|
2.59
|
|
SALESFORCE.COM
|
CRM
|
4,151
|
36.96
|
160.70
|
85.95
|
8.39
|
5.81
|
|
SAP AG ADR
|
SAP
|
66,861
|
52.82
|
27.65
|
24.57
|
5.57
|
5.14
|
|
TIBCO SOFTWARE
|
TIBX
|
1,981
|
9.41
|
26.89
|
24.13
|
3.83
|
3.43
|
|
MICROSOFT
|
MSFT
|
295,110
|
30.02
|
24.81
|
17.87
|
6.42
|
5.37
|
|
BEA SYSTEMS
|
BEAS
|
5,590
|
12.66
|
23.44
|
20.42
|
3.99
|
3.73
|
|
SYBASE
|
SY
|
2,268
|
24.89
|
17.05
|
16.48
|
2.62
|
2.27
|
|
Median
|
|
|
|
24.81
|
20.42
|
3.99
|
3.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORACLE
|
ORCL
|
88,843
|
17.1
|
22.47
|
19.82
|
4.98
|
4.24
|
|
Discount (premium) to peers median
|
|
|
|
9%
|
3%
|
-25%
|
Source: Analyst estimates for ORCL, other stocks - consensus.
FORECAST: Income statement
US GAAP, $ million
(in millions, except per share data) Year Ended May 31
|
Q1 FY07
|
Q2 FY07
|
Q3 FY07E
|
Q4 FY07E
|
FY06
|
FY07E
|
FY08E
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New software licenses
|
804
|
1,207
|
1,235
|
2,364
|
4,905
|
5,610
|
6,174
|
|
Software license updates and product support
|
1,941
|
2,007
|
2,143
|
2,308
|
6,636
|
8,399
|
9,961
|
|
Software revenues
|
2,745
|
3,214
|
3,378
|
4,672
|
11,541
|
14,009
|
16,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
846
|
949
|
916
|
1,137
|
2,839
|
3,849
|
4,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
3,591
|
4,163
|
4,294
|
5,809
|
14,380
|
17,858
|
20,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
750
|
915
|
954
|
1,264
|
3,177
|
3,883
|
4,554
|
|
Software license updates and product support
|
200
|
205
|
222
|
251
|
719
|
878
|
1,029
|
|
Cost of services
|
780
|
820
|
819
|
961
|
2,516
|
3,380
|
4,173
|
|
Research and development
|
506
|
519
|
588
|
664
|
1,872
|
2,277
|
2,670
|
|
General and administrative
|
157
|
170
|
174
|
168
|
555
|
669
|
785
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
205
|
202
|
222
|
244
|
583
|
873
|
961
|
|
Acquisition related
|
48
|
-36
|
60
|
70
|
137
|
142
|
156
|
|
Restructuring
|
9
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
85
|
42
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
2,655
|
2,806
|
3,051
|
3,633
|
9,644
|
12,144
|
14,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
936
|
1,357
|
1,244
|
2,177
|
4,736
|
5,714
|
6,568
|
|
Interest expense
|
-83
|
-82
|
-90
|
-99
|
-169
|
-354
|
-390
|
|
Non-operating income, net
|
102
|
79
|
79
|
79
|
243
|
339
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
955
|
1,354
|
1,233
|
2,156
|
4,810
|
5,698
|
6,551
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
292
|
387
|
362
|
634
|
1,429
|
1,675
|
1,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
663
|
967
|
870
|
1,523
|
3,381
|
4,024
|
4,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: (US GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.13
|
$0.19
|
$0.17
|
$0.29
|
$0.65
|
$0.78
|
$0.88
|
|
Diluted
|
$0.13
|
$0.18
|
$0.16
|
$0.29
|
$0.64
|
$0.76
|
$0.86
|
Source: SEC filings, analyst estimates.
[1] Based on 2005 data, source: Gartner.
[2] Source:
http://news.zdnet.com/2010-3513_.html.
[3] Source: Q1FY07 Earnings Call,
available at http://seekingalpha.com/article/17179.
[4] Transcript available at
http://seekingalpha.com/article/17179.
[5] Data from management in this paragraph
reflect non-GAAP measures.
[6] Oracle F2Q07 (Qtr End 11/30/06) Earnings Call from December 18, 2006, transcript available at http://seekingalpha.com/article/22626.
[7] Some of these opinions can be found
here: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_.html.
[8] Source:
http://www.destinationcrm.com/articles/default.asp?ArticleID=6162.
[9] Source:
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid21_gci1225126,00.html.
[10] Source:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9593_.html.
[11] Source: Q3FY06 earnings call,
available at http://seekingalpha.com/article/18842.
[12] Source:
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2169225/microsoft-beats-oracle-security,
white paper available at http://www.databasesecurity.com/dbsec/comparison.pdf.
[13] Source: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/itanalyst/docs/ESGNov2006SQLServerSecurity.pdf.
[14] Source: AMR
Research
[15] Source: IDC.
[16] Source: IDC.
[17] Source: Gartner.
[18] Source: Gartner.
[19] Source:
http://www.gartner.com/press_releases/asset_153343_11.html.
[20] Software
segment only; annual (2005) values.
Contact:
|